• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Paul Clapham
  • Knute Snortum
  • Rob Spoor
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Ron McLeod
  • Piet Souris
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Holloway
  • Frits Walraven
  • Ganesh Patekar

anonymous inner classes

Ranch Hand
Posts: 238
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
>>>Inner classes can be created within methods. This is something that GUI builders like Borland JBuilder do a great deal of when creating Event handlers.

Here is an example of such automatically generated code

buttonControl1.addMouseListener(new java.awt.event.MouseAdapter() {
public void mouseClicked(MouseEvent e) {


As you might guess an anonymous class cannot have be given a constructor by the programmer. Think about it, a constructor is a method with no return value and the same name as the class. Duh! we are talking about classes without names. An anonymous class may extend another class or implement a single interface

A class defined within a method can only access fields in the enclosing method if they have been defined as final. This is because variables defined within methods normally are considered automatic, ie they only exist whilst the method is executing. Fields defined within a class created within a method may outlive the enclosing method.

I was reading above lines from link

did not understand it clearly.

Any ideas, resources,sample code,links, highly appreciated. thanks in advance.
Posts: 65026
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
There are several errors in your quotes. A constructor isn't a method. The behaviour of local variables is described correctly, but we do not usually use the word automatic to describe such behaviour. The code you quote contains a compiler error.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!