• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • paul wheaton
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Roland Mueller
  • Himai Minh
Bartenders:

PrimeFaces VS RichFaces VS ...?

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 42
Android Google Web Toolkit Spring
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi all,

What is your favorite JSF implementation?

Imho PrimeFaces seems to have an edge since it uses jQuery and has jQuery mobile implementation.
What is your opinion on this? Any other implementations you would recommend?

Thanks and best wishes,

Jochen

ps: can't we post a poll on the forums?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 50
jQuery Eclipse IDE Google App Engine
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I was using IceFaces and i have to say its great...

But I moved to PrimeFaces (Cause I'm working on Google App Engine - and PrimeFcae were the only one that supported it) and its awesome!!!


never used RichFaces (although it looks nice)


Take a look on each of the above Show Case.... just type in google PrimeFcaes Show Case... Its WAY cooler than the other two (Way way cooler) PrimeFaces got tons of components... they adding new ones all the time and improving the existing

PrimeFaces got Themes... lots of... (and you can easily create your own.


So If you want to develop an application that will look great... go for PrimeFaces...


Regards,


Daniel.
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic