nirjari patel wrote:Is there any diference in coding of JSP and JSPF ?
A jspf doesn't need to be a complete and sytnax-complete JSP, as it is statically included in a JSP (that does need to be complete).
If I want to give JSPF extension to a JSP page, will that work ?
Of course not. Why would you do such a thing?
do I need to code JSP page in a certain way in order to call it JSPF ?
The JSP simply uses the include directive to include the fragment.
We can just create JSP page and include it in another JSP page with include action (oe whatever legal way).
Yes, you can do that. But in the case of the include action, the included JSP must be syntax-complete.