• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • paul wheaton
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

How is -Integer.MIN_VALUE Equal to Integer.MIN_VALUE

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 31
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I observed an interesting fact

System.out.println(-Integer.MIN_VALUE == Integer.MIN_VALUE);//output: true

System.out.println(-Integer.MIN_VALUE); // output : -2147483648

Why is that a negative int remains negative when negated???

----------------------------------
Regards

Avinash
 
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Write out its bit pattern. HInt: you can get it from Integer.toBinaryString(Integer.Min_VALUE). It might be 1 and thirty-one 0s. Or it might not be.
Work out its two's complement when negated: Hint: Write out the bit pattern for 2 to the 32nd. That is 1 and thirty-two 0s. Subtract the binary pattern for -2147483648 from that. And what do you get . . . Tadaaa!

Google for arithmetic overflow and two's complement binary integers, and you will get a different explanation of the same thing.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Negating an int and getting the same value works for the value you have shown, and one other value. I shall let you guess which other value.
 
Avinash Haridasu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 31
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Can any one tell me
how do we decide whether a number is negative or positive just by looking at the binary representation

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 = 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = −1
and

System.out.println( 32 >> 37); // output: 1
System.out.println( 32 >> 5); // output: 1

How is this possible???
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 247
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Avinash Haridasu wrote:Can any one tell me
how do we decide whether a number is negative or positive just by looking at the binary representation

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 = 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = −1


.
In binary number system we can use only 2 things and that is 0 and 1 and we have to use 0 and 1 for representing the negative numbers also.There is something known as MSB(most significant bit) and LSB(least significant bit). Now the left-most-bit is your MSB and right-most-bit is LSB. Example 01010101 Here the one in red color is MSB and the one in green color is LSB..
.
So you must have understood what is MSB and LSB. Now if the MSB is 0 then the number is positive and if the MSB is 1 then the number is negative. So the conclusion is MSB represents the sign of the number and other numbers(i would say bits ) are the actual value. So
Since MSB is 0 therefore number is positive and waht about the value 0000001 is equal to 1 and therefor ans is . Now Now MSB is 1 therefore number is negative and Java uses 2's complement for negative numbers and the 2's complement of 11111111 is 00000001 and therefore the ans is -1 (Please find out how to find 2's complement if you are not aware).
.
As for your second question about >> i am not sure.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Your description of the values of LSB and MSB is correct, but you ought to remember that only applies to two's complement numbers. The char for example is unsigned and behaves differently.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Look in the Java Language Specification and you find that the number of bits shifted is calculated % i where i is the number of bits in the datatype. So for everything except a long, shift 37 and shift 5 have the same effect.
i >> 5 is equivalent to i / 32

 
Rameshwar Soni
Ranch Hand
Posts: 247
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Campbell Ritchie wrote:but you ought to remember that only applies to two's complement numbers. The char for example is unsigned and behaves differently.


Behaves differently ? Can you give an example so that i can understand it better?
 
Java Cowboy
Posts: 16084
88
Android Scala IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
char is like an unsigned 16-bit number. You can't store negative values in a char. So a char with the bit pattern 1111 1111 1111 1111 has the value 65536, not -32768. In other words, for a char, two's complement is not used.
 
Bartender
Posts: 15741
368
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Did you mean -1?
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Actually it's not quite i % 32, but more like i & 31, which behaves similarly to i % 32 but gives a positive result from a negative left operand.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Stephan van Hulst wrote:Did you mean -1?

No, Jesper actually means 65535, assuming that is the bit pattern for a char. That is equivalent to the Unicode character for ffff, and you can find what that is here.
 
Stephan van Hulst
Bartender
Posts: 15741
368
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sorry, I was referring to Jesper's:

not -32768


 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes, I got confused about that. I agree that's "not -1".
 
Jesper de Jong
Java Cowboy
Posts: 16084
88
Android Scala IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ok, again...:

char is like an unsigned 16-bit number. You can't store negative values in a char. So a char with the bit pattern 1111 1111 1111 1111 has the value 65535, not -1. In other words, for a char, two's complement is not used.
 
Avinash Haridasu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 31
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Campbell Ritchie wrote:Look in the Java Language Specification and you find that the number of bits shifted is calculated % i where i is the number of bits in the datatype. So for everything except a long, shift 37 and shift 5 have the same effect.
i >> 5 is equivalent to i / 32



As per Specification:

If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & with the mask value 0x1f. The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.

But why it is "only the five lowest-order bits" ???

Can any one please explain ??

 
Stephan van Hulst
Bartender
Posts: 15741
368
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Because you don't need any more than that. With 5 bits you can create the values 0-31, enough to perform any possible shift distance on an int.
 
Avinash Haridasu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 31
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Need small clarification on shifting:

32 In Binary: 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0010 0000

32>>1:
0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0001 0000

32>>2:
0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 1000

32>>1:
0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0001

32>>6:
0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000 - 0000 0000

When 32>>6 is itself 0 - Then how 32>>33 is 16, 32>>38 is 0 ???
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 80639
472
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The Java Language Specification link I gave you yesterday explains it all. There are 32 bits to an int, so you cannot shift an int more than 31 bits. You can fit 31 into 5 bits. [A long can be shifted up to 63 bits, and you can fit 63 into 6 bits.] If you shifted it 32 bits, you would come back to where you started, so i >> 32 is the same as i, which is the same as i >> 0. So you can shift an int by |n % 32| bits, where || is the absolute value operator. Now the absolute value of n % 32 is the same (in binary arithmetic) as n & 32 - 1. And as we all know, 32 - 1 = 0x1f. If you write the bit pattern for 0x1f you find it has 5 1s in. So you get 5 bits masked.

32 bits in an int.
32 = 2 to the 5th.
So you shift an int by the rightmost (least significant) five bits (six for a long).
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic