• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Fail Part II: Help needed urgently.

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 13
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


I got below result. Need your help, which section I need to improve?
Total 114 marks needed for passing the exam was mentioned in assignment. Individual section passing marks was not mentioned .

Got Below result:

Your Score: 118 Passing Score: 114 Result: Fail
------------------------------------------------

Questions 20 of 24
Remarks: More detail required for E2, E5, E8

Class Diagram 30 of 40
Class Diagram : UML Compliance 10 of 10
Class Diagram: Requirements 20 of 30
Remarks: Missing domain class/explanation, Missing class level details for business domain model

Component Diagram 35 of 40
Component Diagram: UML Compliance 5 of 10
Remarks: Incorrect/inconsistent UML notation used for interfaces
Component Diagram: Requirements 30 of 30


Deployment 14 of 24
Diagram Deployment Diagram: UML Compliance 4 of 4
Deployment Diagram: Requirements 10 of 20
Remarks: More detail required, Firewall deployment missing details, Missing platform profile details for RDBMS, Missing # (virtual) CPUs assigned per tier

Interaction Diagram 7 of 16
Interaction Diagram: UML Compliance 4 of 4
Interaction Diagram: Requirements 3 of 12
Remarks: Incorrect starting component for Use Cases, Missing details (steps) from Use Case

Technical Risks 12 of 16
Remarks: More detail/clarity required for mitigation of security, More detail/clarity required for mitigation of Extensibility


With regards,
Felix T

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Thomas,

Here are minimum marks that I got from one post in this forum:

Component Diagram ---- 40 ---- 26
Class Diagram ---- 40 ---- 26
Deployment Diagram ---- 24 ---- 17
Interaction Diagrams ---- 16 ---- 0
Risk & Migration List ---- 16 ---- 0
Part 3 Short Answer ---- 24 ---- 17
Total 160

As I can see, you failed in Deployment Diagram (you need to have 17 but got only 14).
Here is also good topic regarding the same situation: failed-although-enough-points

And I saw couple posts with recommendations for improvement of deployment diagram part in the forum.
 
What could go wrong in a swell place like "The Evil Eye"? Or with this tiny ad?
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic