I know i cannt add anything other than null in this..But can anybody know the use of this...Why we need this..Please provide me one example for its usage..
Using such method you can get last element of any List regardless it is List<Integer> or List<Anything>. Note, that List<?> is not equivalent to List<Object>. If you would try to replace method signature in line 01. to
then you can use this method only for List<Object>, but not for List<Integer> or List<Anything>. This is because List<Integer> or List<Anything> are not subtypes of List<Object>.
The motivation for adding generics to the Java programming language stems from the lack of information about a collection's element type, the need for developers to keep track of what type of elements collections contain, and the need for casts all over the place. Using generics, a collection is no longer treated as a list of Object references, but you would be able to differentiate between a collection of references to Integers and collection of references to Bytes. A collection with a generic type has a type parameter that specifies the element type to be stored in the collection.
As an example, consider the following segment of code that creates a linked list and adds an element to the list:
LinkedList list = new LinkedList();
list.add(new Integer(1));
Integer num = (Integer) list.get(0);
As you can see, when an element is extracted from the list it must be cast. The casting is safe as it will be checked at runtime, but if you cast to a type that is different from, and not a supertype of, the extracted type then a runtime exception, ClassCastException will be thrown.
Using generic types, the previous segment of code can be written as follows:
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList<Integer>();
list.add(new Integer(1));
Integer num = list.get(0);
Here we say that LinkedList is a generic class that takes a type parameter, Integer in this case.
The motivation for adding generics to the Java programming language stems from the lack of information about a collection's element type, the need for developers to keep track of what type of elements collections contain, and the need for casts all over the place. Using generics, a collection is no longer treated as a list of Object references, but you would be able to differentiate between a collection of references to Integers and collection of references to Bytes. A collection with a generic type has a type parameter that specifies the element type to be stored in the collection.
As an example, consider the following segment of code that creates a linked list and adds an element to the list:
LinkedList list = new LinkedList();
list.add(new Integer(1));
Integer num = (Integer) list.get(0);
As you can see, when an element is extracted from the list it must be cast. The casting is safe as it will be checked at runtime, but if you cast to a type that is different from, and not a supertype of, the extracted type then a runtime exception, ClassCastException will be thrown.
Using generic types, the previous segment of code can be written as follows:
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList<Integer>();
list.add(new Integer(1));
Integer num = list.get(0);
Here we say that LinkedList is a generic class that takes a type parameter, Integer in this case.
Completely out of my question....
Post by:autobot
I guess everyone has an angle. Fine, what do you want? Just know that you cannot have this tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards