• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Knute Snortum
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Ron McLeod
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Holloway
  • salvin francis

thread join problem statement  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 215
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Can you tell me how the code snippet of the following problem look like....

"You have thread T1, T2 and T3, how will you ensure that thread T2 run after T1 and thread T3 run after T2?"

I have given try to code this...Please tell me whether this is correct or not?


 
Ranch Foreman
Posts: 3248
19
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yeah, that seems to work.

One has to wonder though, why anyone would ever, ever use threads for such a purpose. I mean, if you just want everything to run sequentially, don't use threads. Easy.
 
Bartender
Posts: 6109
6
Android IntelliJ IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes, I agree--it will work, but it's a pointless problem statement. Note also that you don't need the t3.join(), since the problem statement says nothing about waiting for T3 to end.

A more reasonable problem statement--one that shows the actual practical use of join(), would be something like: "You have T1, T2, and T3. T1 and T2 can execute concurrently, but T3 has to wait for both of them before it can run." Or even, "You have two threads T1 and T2 that are allowed to run concurrently, but your main thread must wait until they both finish before it can continue with its work."

Go ahead and give one or both of those a try.

What we're modelling with those is something like this: "I want to bake a cake. Joe, you go to the grocery store and get eggs, milk, flour, etc. Mary, you go to the housewares store and get a mixer, measuring cups, and a cake pan. I'll start baking when you both get back." Joe and Mary can do their jobs independently of and in parallel to each other, but I have to wait until they both complete their tasks before I can start doing anything.
 
Rahul Ba
Ranch Hand
Posts: 215
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
No, It was only interview question. Thanks for help.
 
I suggest huckleberry pie. But the only thing on the gluten free menu is this tiny ad:
how do I do my own kindle-like thing - without amazon
https://coderanch.com/t/711421/engineering/kindle-amazon
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!