Annonynous inner class error

[Vinicius Souza]

Hi friends! Im testing annonymous classes and I cant get it compiled. See my test:

public class Test
{
	public class Xuxu
	{
		int x;
		public Xuxu()
		{
			System.out.println("Im a constructor!");
		}
		
		protected void Teste()
		{
			System.out.println(x);
		}
	}
	public static void main(String[] args)
	{
		new Xuxu() 
		{
			
			protected void Teste()
			{
				x = 20;
				super.Teste();
			}
		};

	}
}

When I try to compile this code the java says that I need to put a ';' to close the block. Whats wrong?
Im getting this error "No enclosing instance of type Test is accessible. Must qualify the allocation with an enclosing instance of type Test (e.g. x.new A() where x is an instance of Test)."
Can someone explain what the compiler is talking about?
Thanks!

[William P O'Sullivan]

Line 25, and you have another error ...

WP

[Vinicius Souza]

William P O'Sullivan wrote:Line 25, and you have another error ...

WP

I putted the ";" and fixed the code but now Im get a new (and more confusing) error....

[William P O'Sullivan]

Let me guess, something along the lines of "return type"?

EDIT: I see you already got that one.
How about letting us know what error you are getting?

WP

[Vinicius Souza]

William P O'Sullivan wrote:Let me guess, something along the lines of "return type"?

WP

Im getting this error :

"No enclosing instance of type Test is accessible. Must qualify the allocation with an enclosing instance of type Test (e.g. x.new A() where x is an instance of Test)." 

Someone can explain it to me? Thanks!

[Larry Frissell]

You can not have New Xuxu ( a non-staitic variable) in a static context (the main method)

[Steve Luke]

The XuXu class is a non-static member of the Test class, which means you must have an instance of Test to have an instance of XuXu. So you might change the main method to something like this:

  public static void main(String[] args)
  {
    Xuxu x = new Test().new Xuxu() 
    {		
      protected void Teste()
      {
        x = 20;
        super.Teste();
      }
    };
    x.Teste();
  }

Or you could make XuXu static...

[Vinicius Souza]

Humm, its make sense guys. Thanks a lot for yours explanations.