• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Tim Cooke
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
Sheriffs:
  • Knute Snortum
  • paul wheaton
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Ron McLeod
  • Piet Souris
  • Ganesh Patekar
Bartenders:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • salvin francis

why are so many people using old versions of websphere?

 
author & internet detective
Posts: 39433
768
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Currently only WebSphere 7+ are supported by IBM. Yet we get a lot of questions about WebSphere 6. And I've even seen a couple about WSAD 5 still.

To anyone using the older tools: do you know why your employer hasn't upgraded. I'm curious what a reason could be.
 
Sheriff
Posts: 13690
227
Mac Android IntelliJ IDE Eclipse IDE Spring Debian Java Ubuntu Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
IT organizations often end up putting policies in place that make it easier for them to manage change in the short term but make it harder to allow change in the long term. Add onto that problem the fact that they are responsible for keeping the lights on for dozens to hundreds of different applications, none of which they have direct control over the design and implementation, upgrading to a new version can eat up quite a bit of time and effort.

We just upgraded to WAS 6 a year ago, just as it was about to get EOL'ed. The upgrade and migration involved hundreds of applications and it took over a year to coordinate the change with all the affected teams. I wouldn't be surprised if some shops are still running on WAS 5 or even WAS 4. Not trying to make excuses for IT because they really should figure out a way to provide a smooth upgrade path for their orgs. But the reality in the real world shows that many IT orgs just simply fall short of that ideal and a lot of people pay dearly for it. Luckily for us, IT figured out that they can have separate environments for WAS 5, 6, and 7. It just costs a bit more and IT doesn't have it as easy when they only had to support one version.
 
Rancher
Posts: 43011
76
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I presume for the same reason there are still so many questions about how to make things work on Java 1.4. (And yes, that reason is a mystery to me, too :-)
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:Currently only WebSphere 7+ are supported by IBM. Yet we get a lot of questions about WebSphere 6. And I've even seen a couple about WSAD 5 still.

To anyone using the older tools: do you know why your employer hasn't upgraded. I'm curious what a reason could be.



Next 2-3 months many will upgrade to 7...
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 14
Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Many clients uses third party apps, they upgrade to new versions wen the vendor certifies the app on new versions. They don't take any risk.
 
Did Steve tell you that? Fuh - Steve. Just look at this tiny ad:
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!