• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

RPC/literal in Ivan notes

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 90
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I am very impressed with scdjws5studynotes by Ivan.I got a doubt while i reading this,he mentioned the drawback of RPC/literal as


A drawback is that if there is a new version of an operation in the service that needs, for instance, additional parameters
then the clients need to upgrade as the service changes, unless of course both the old and the new
version of the service are published at the same time.



what it mean by upgrade as the service changes?can any one explain this very clearly?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 859
IBM DB2 Chrome Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
RPC Clients must match the Web Service Providers layout (WSDL).

As this changes, it can render the client modules inoperable.

This is not the case (mostly) with document/literal SOAP conversations.

WP
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic