Anrd
"One of the best things you could do is to simplify a larger application into a smaller one by reducing its process and complexity - Fowler"
Bear Bibeault wrote:For what purpose? I'd have very different answers depending upon the answer to that question.
Claude Moore wrote:I've heard of Google's language Dart which seems promising to write web apps, for example...
Claude Moore wrote:For any purpose may come into your mind. For example, Java is a language used pratically everywhere... you can write enterprise apps as well as simple mobile apps. Which may be next Java ? I've heard of Google's language Dart which seems promising to write web apps, for example...
Pat Farrell wrote:
Many mechanics use a hammer, screwdriver and pliers to do everything when repairing a car. This does not mean that they are the best tools for the job.
Pat Farrell wrote:
Every few years, yet another language/foundation is labeled as the silver bullet that will solve all problems. A very smart man, Fred Brooks, write "No Silver Bullet"
I've been watching this for 40 years, and so far, Brooks is right.
Frank Carver wrote:If I were a betting man, I would be putting some cash on Rust right now.
Rust seems to be the only language in several decades which has been able to seriously challenge C for low-level and systems work, and its approach to security and robustness is the best in class at the moment.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Out on HF and heard nobody, but didn't call CQ? Nobody heard you either. 73 de N7GH
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
Les Morgan wrote:
2 - whatever seems to be the emergent technology in the area i wish to live. For me, right now that is:
a) MS SQL Server
b) C#
c) Java
This has served me well for decades now.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Tim Holloway wrote:These aren't "emergent" technologies, though — which was the original question.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Wasm is designed as a portable compilation target for programming languages, enabling deployment on the web for client and server applications.
Regards Pete
Out on HF and heard nobody, but didn't call CQ? Nobody heard you either. 73 de N7GH
Les Morgan wrote:Tim,
very true, but none the less, if you do not have any real emergent technology in your area... this is what i go with, and it's where the big money is right now too.
Les
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Claude Moore wrote:Hi to all,
if you would bet on an emerging technology / programming language, which would be your choice ?
code is emotional
Out on HF and heard nobody, but didn't call CQ? Nobody heard you either. 73 de N7GH
SCJP 5, OCPJP 7, 8, SCJD 5, SCWCD 4, SCBCD 5, SCJWS 4, IBM OOAD 833 & 834, MongoDB Developer
Out on HF and heard nobody, but didn't call CQ? Nobody heard you either. 73 de N7GH
See where your hand is? Not there. It's next to this tiny ad:
Low Tech Laboratory
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/paulwheaton/low-tech-0
|