Mike Simmons wrote:Nah, Oak was before Java 1.0. Java 1.0 was called Java 1.0. And Oak wasn't the codename of a particular version, it was the name of the language. So it wouldn't have fit on Paul's list, really.
I did leave it off the list deliberately, but not for any particular reason that I can remember. But I'm going to take this reason and retroactively say that's why I did it.