Campbell Ritchie wrote:And you rarely need synchronisation, so you usually use StringBuilder instead.
"Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow" - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
Mike Simmons wrote:Yeah - but most of those things, like Stack, are legacy things from Java 1.0 or 1.1.
"Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow" - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
Winston Gutkowski wrote:
Or indeed, when they create an interface that includes both?
Mike Simmons wrote:I would rather they just got rid of StringBuffer entirely. No need to keep the interfaces polluted with a useless class.
It runs on an internal combustion engine. This ad does not:
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
|