so many better and powerful API's
Sai Hegde wrote:I did some initial proof of concepts about 6 months back comparing Spring Integration and Camel and felt Camel was far better and easier to use.
I hate having to go through large XML config files that make me dizzy. Camel has excellent support for DSL's which is far better to read than XML and extremely handy when you are writing complex integration logic.
Mule ESB can be used as a lightweight framework by using only the bare minimum libraries. Also Mule has great connectors to Paypal, SAP and other proprietary interfaces.
Sai Hegde wrote:Yes it does now with Scala and Groovy, but then it is the same argument about Spring Integration playing a catch up game as JavaEE does with Spring.
kato Kwong wrote:Mate, I love your brazen attack on Camel code quality. Poor old Camel.
I would like to point out you have not backed this up with any of the somehow you would like from a Spring Integration critic...