Win a copy of The Career Toolkit this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Paul Clapham
  • Ron McLeod
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Jj Roberts
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • salvin francis
  • Frits Walraven
  • Piet Souris

My Technology Radar

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 21
1
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello,

ThoughtWorks published a recent version of their Technology Radar these days and Neil Ford did some explanation on it with the recommendation to "Build Your Own Technology Radar".

So here is My Technology Radar: http://frvabe.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-technology-radar.html

Best regards
Franz
 
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Are you sure about the "Hold" section of your radar?
 
Bartender
Posts: 3225
34
IntelliJ IDE Oracle Spring Chrome Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Hussein Baghdadi wrote:Are you sure about the "Hold" section of your radar?



Just in case you have misinterpreted the "Hold" meaning in the radar ( I just did that and came to similar conclusion)

The "Hold" section indicates: use it because it is well established (regularly put it to the test)
 
Hussein Baghdadi
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
According to Neal Ford:

The original intent of the hold ring was “hold off for now”, to represent technologies that were too new to reasonably assess yet. We had in mind technologies that were getting lots of buzz but weren’t proven. The hold ring has evolved into our way of saying “don’t start anything new with this technology”. There’s no harm in using it on existing projects, but you should think twice about using this technology for new development. Hold is the closest we have to an avoid category, which Rebecca won’t let us have. But we’ve come to see great wisdom in that decision: true to the metaphor, your radar should be about things you are looking towards, not recriminations about the past.

 
Mohamed Sanaulla
Bartender
Posts: 3225
34
IntelliJ IDE Oracle Spring Chrome Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I initially thought OP meant what Neal Ford meant. But then OP mentions "Hold" as adapt or keep using. This is confusing for the readers. May be stick with the terminology.
 
Franz van Betteraey
Greenhorn
Posts: 21
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I indeed changed the definitions (and even the layout) so that it fits to my needs (like Neal Ford says: "You can use our quadrants or create your own"). So my "Hold" is much more positive (green) like the original ToughtWorks one. But I see the point that it is a pitfall for misunderstanding and consider to change it in the future. Thanks for pointing this out!
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic