Ryan McGuire wrote:If I recall, a penny is 19mm in diameter, and they appear to be packing them like hexagons.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and offbyone errors
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and offbyone errors
Henry Wong wrote:
Regardless, how does the math work to get to $2.97 per square feet? It obviously isn't $1.44, which I am thinking was calculated assuming pennies that are oneinch diameter, in a square pattern (which clearly, they are not).
Henry
Ryan McGuire wrote:
* As luck would have it, I remember from high school the formula for the area of a hexagon given its sidetoside diameter, but I still have to work it out when give the length of one side. A = D^2 * sqrt(3)/2
Henry Wong wrote:BTW, I never knew the formula for a hexagon. I had to calculate it as six equilateral triangles, where the height is the radius of the penny, and the base is calculated via trigonometry (of a 30/60/90 triangle).
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and offbyone errors
SCJP, SCWCD.
Asking Good Questions
Amit Ghorpade wrote:If it were per square foot, then how does it matter if it is arranged as a hexagon? I admit that geometry was not my cup of tea ever, but still.
So I calculated using the total mm in a square foot given by fred which is 92,903.04 mm and dividing it by area of the penny which is 285.022 square mm.
Which gives me $3.26. Am I missing something obvious here??
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and offbyone errors
fred rosenberger wrote:in other words...
A penny is a circle. you cannot get solid coverage with circles, as there are spaces between them.
You can with hexagons, or squares, or many other shapes...
Take a look at this. You can see some shpaes allow complete coverage with no overlaps or gaps, and others don't. There are also better ways to 'pack' them in. If you aligned them in a square grid, you'd have larger gaps than if you offset each row  you can kind of squeeze down the size of the gaps. I believe that packing them this way minimizes the gaps, and is best represented by a hexagon.
Ryan McGuire wrote:Square grid > larger gaps > fewer pennies > cheaper per square foot.
fred rosenberger wrote:iA penny is a circle. you cannot get solid coverage with circles, as there are spaces between them.
SCJP, SCWCD.
Asking Good Questions
Matthew Brown wrote:But you would have to factor in greater wearandtear on your shoes.
if you think brussel sprouts are yummy, you should try any other food. And this tiny ad:
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
