Help coderanch get a
new server
by contributing to the fundraiser
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • paul wheaton
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Mikalai Zaikin
Bartenders:
  • Lou Hamers
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven

To the authors: any thoughts on Mono?

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 236
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi -

Any thoughts on whether companies interested in Open Source J2EE might also consider - or maybe even prefer - .Net over J2EE? Do you think initiatives like Mono might pose a competitive threat to the J2EE community?

Thank you in advance .. PSM
 
author
Posts: 27
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sorry, I have not been following Mono very closely. Following Java and all the open source Java projects takes all my free time. Well Java and my cute 6 month old son.
 
author
Posts: 25
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I've played with Mono and I think is a wonderful idea. I'm also glad that Novell is behind the wheel now. Miguel DeIcaza has wonderful intentions on where to take Mono, I'm just afraid that Microsoft is going to pull a "Microsoft" sooner or later and Mono will be force to become it's own platform by forking away from some of the APIs and keeping only some low level similarities/compatibilities with the .Net stack. I personally don't think we need a multilanguage environment (which we partially have with Java since there are countless of languages that can be compiled to Java bytecode). Basically I believe you can do ASP.Net with Mono currently which I think is MS killer technology (at least for medium size apps). But I think the future of Mono on Linux is to give LAMP applications some of the enterprise features that you get from J2EE without having to buy on the whole stack (e.g. lightweight containers in .Net like Pico, Nano and the like). This also involves making PHP, Perl, Ruby, etc. .Net compatible languages. Maybe the Spring Framework ported to .Net. That's where I see potential for Mono in the Enterprise arena. For GUI apps I think the combination of Java+SWT (or Swing for non traditional apps) can give you the same advantages as WinForms)

Brian
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic