• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

The children of SOAP's body should be namespaced qualified or may be?

 
Bartender
Posts: 2416
13
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
According to this specification , http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ , it says "the immediate children element of SOAP body may be namespace qualified".
But according to MZ's notes , p27, it says all immediate children should be namespace qualified.
So, which statement is valid?
 
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Posts: 3411
320
Android Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

So, which statement is valid?


When you consider the SOAP specifications v1.1 : it is MAY be qualified (Immediate child elements of the SOAP Body element MAY be namespace-qualified.)

When you conform yourself to the Basic Profile v1.1: it MUST be qualified (R1014 The children of the soap:Body element in an ENVELOPE MUST be namespace qualified.)

So actually, both are correct...

Regards,
Frits
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic