• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Henry Wong
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Tim Cooke
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
  • salvin francis
  • fred rosenberger

The children of SOAP's body should be namespaced qualified or may be?

Ranch Foreman
Posts: 1897
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
According to this specification , http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ , it says "the immediate children element of SOAP body may be namespace qualified".
But according to MZ's notes , p27, it says all immediate children should be namespace qualified.
So, which statement is valid?
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Posts: 3341
Android Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

So, which statement is valid?

When you consider the SOAP specifications v1.1 : it is MAY be qualified (Immediate child elements of the SOAP Body element MAY be namespace-qualified.)

When you conform yourself to the Basic Profile v1.1: it MUST be qualified (R1014 The children of the soap:Body element in an ENVELOPE MUST be namespace qualified.)

So actually, both are correct...

Today's lesson is that you can't wear a jetpack AND a cape. I should have read this tiny ad:
Devious Experiments for a Truly Passive Greenhouse!
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic