This week's book giveaway is in the Cloud/Virtualization forum.
We're giving away four copies of Kubernetes in Action and have Marko Luksa on-line!
See this thread for details.
Win a copy of Kubernetes in Action this week in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

additional element after soap:Body?  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1603
10
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In MZ's version 5 notes on p.3, "An envelop must not have any element children of soap:Envelop following the soap:Body element".

Invalid example:

But on p.27,"SOAP 1.1 allows additional elements to follow the SOPABody element, SOAP 1.2 disallows these".

So, which statement is correct?
 
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 3064
248
Android Chrome Eclipse IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
p3 is talking about what is ok according to Basic Profile v1.1, not about what is allowed by the SOAP protocol.
 
Himai Minh
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1603
10
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This may be a good exam question:


So here are the correct options:
1. this envelop is not BP 1.1 compliant
2. this envelop is SOAP 1.1 compliant
3. this envelop is not SOAP 1.2 compliant

 
Frits Walraven
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 3064
248
Android Chrome Eclipse IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yeah, only that SOAP 1.2 is not part of the EE6 exam...
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!