La Vish wrote:I am using that name since 2002 and suddenly in 2014 you find that it is against your same old naming policy?
I wouldn't call it
suddenly. It so happens, I noticed it for the first time today and it did not 'sound real' to me, which is all the name policy expects. Why was it not challenged for so many years? Who knows. Maybe it's because you do not post that frequently. (161 posts counting the one above).
La Vish wrote:You could change your name to Man God and still it would be valid, wouldn't it
I doubt, as it does not 'sound real'. As you can see, Henry would think the same.