"Il y a peu de choses qui me soient impossibles..."
"Il y a peu de choses qui me soient impossibles..."
Agree, but it is probably not a default constructor. It is probably an ordinary no‑arguments constructor, which the JLS calls a nullary constructor. Nullary in that context refers to the 0‑length arguments list, not to anything being null.Rico Felix wrote: . . . does contain a default constructor... . . . ...
No, it has a no arguments constructor. But many of its subclasses only have constructors with arguments.siddharth das wrote: . . .
Object class has its default construtor , means we can write new Object().
. . .
siddharth das wrote:
Then what is the problem with Java compiler with the Statement ' private Object t = new Object();'
Object class has its default construtor , means we can write new Object().
"Il y a peu de choses qui me soient impossibles..."
Campbell Ritchie wrote:
Agree, but it is probably not a default constructor.Rico Felix wrote: . . . does contain a default constructor... . . . ...
Another pitfall of the, “That's how you do it in C++.” type. At least here it is only nomenclature and won't cause logic errors.Ivan Jozsef Balazs wrote: . . .
The term "default constructor" means in C++ . . .
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater. |