• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Knute Snortum
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • salvin francis
  • Ron McLeod
  • Frits Walraven
  • Pete Letkeman

Mock explanations #14 of chapter 3 (Java OCA 8 Programmer I Study Guide)  RSS feed

Ranch Hand
Posts: 207
Java jQuery Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

When I check my answers for review questions of chapter 3 I saw that my answer of #14 question is correct. But I look at explanation of this question I know that I think wrong in really. Because I forget one detail in this question. I remember substring don't change StringBuilder when I saw explanation. If option B returns "avaJ" I would choose it as correct answer. If we run this code we saw that option B returns "Java" so I didn't consider it as correct answer.
But explanation of #14 is written:

Option B is a nice distraction it does in fact return "avaJ". However, substring() returns a String, which is not stored anywhere.

Probably authors forget to put comment puzzle.reverse(); when run this code.
Posts: 11338
AngularJS Chrome Eclipse IDE Hibernate Java jQuery MySQL Database Spring Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The answers given in the book are correct: A and C will print the required avaJ.

The explanation why B is wrong, is wrong itself If you would print the String returned by option B Java is indeed printed and not avaJ. Therefore it's definitely an incorrect answer (as mentioned in the book). But with the code as-is it's also not a nice distraction as the book suggests. To be a nice distraction option B should be replaced withWith this statement the explanation why B is wrong, would be correct.

And what about the last part of the eplanation of this question: and length() counts starting with 1? Does length() not start with 0? Although I understand what's meant here, I wonder if it would not be better (as in more obvious/clear) to just state that length() just returns the character count.

author & internet detective
Posts: 38681
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!