posted 9 years ago
Hi Himai,
Thanks for the reply. But since it's the container, not the client, who calls the time out callback, I thought the callback should *never* return an object, which then makes "an interceptor for a timeout method returning an object" unreasonable/useless. Am I wrong with "timeout callbacks should never return an object"? Or is the return value of the interceptor meant for something else?
You