The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Tree controls require something similar, but more complex
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
So my best guess would be that you'd attach a "click" AJAX event to nodes and have the event handler check the clicked node to see if its child list had been populated, and if not (or if stale), then populate it
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
But consider a common case where you have a 3-level menu tree of Country, State/Province, City.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
So you can (and should) simplify your thinking by casting it in terms of the simpler Views and Models.
If I'm not mistaken, the tree's "selection" attribute will indicate which node was actually initiating the event
If PrimeFaces doesn't have direct support for anything more dynamic, you can do it the hard way, which is to add a "binding=" attribute to the p:tree element and construct TreeNodes in Java code when the AJAX listeners fire.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
I want to correct a common misconception. JPA Models (also known as Persistence Models or Object Models) are NOT the same thing as JSF's GUI Modes
When I said "dynamic"
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
Well, here's another context. A dataTable uses a DataModel as its Model façade. It does this because the DataModel can wrap a POJO model, but adds some useful JSF-specific features, much like the TreeNode does for PrimeFaces trees.
As far as I know, however, the PrimeFaces doesn't automatically generate TreeNode objects. So if you change the data model, you'd have to manually add/remove TreeNodes and map them to the corresponding added/removed data model objects.
The secret of how to be miserable is to constantly expect things are going to happen the way that they are "supposed" to happen.
You can have faith, which carries the understanding that you may be disappointed. Then there's being a willfully-blind idiot, which virtually guarantees it.
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime. |