• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Rob Spoor
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Scott Selikoff
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Jj Roberts
  • fred rosenberger

Can Oracle sue Google when all Android built on OpenJDK?

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If Google has moved all the Android development using OpenJDK (GPL v2), is there still any possibilities for Oracle to sue Google for using Java?. since its GPL-ed API . thanks lot.
 
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 7353
170
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
That lawsuit is about the use of the Java API, and the use of a small amount of code Google didn't have the right to use. The switch to OpenJDK doesn't affect that, but neither should it give new grounds for lawsuits.
 
Bartender
Posts: 10780
71
Hibernate Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Tim Moores wrote:That lawsuit is about the use of the Java API, and the use of a small amount of code Google didn't have the right to use. The switch to OpenJDK doesn't affect that, but neither should it give new grounds for lawsuits.


To me, it's more about envy than anything else; and also reflects Oracle's philosophy about Java (something they weren't involved in creating) as "their property".

Personally, I hope the judgement is for some portion of the license fees they may have been due (400m) as opposed to the 8.8g they're going after - which represents all profits that Google have made from using Java in a way that Oracle never thought of. However, since they've specifically decided not to pursue the licensing part of the total, I wouldn't have too much problem with them losing this time around as well.

By contrast, Sun's CEO congratulated Google when Android came out with some comment about rocket boosters.

Winston
 
Azzam Sa
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Winston Gutkowski wrote:
To me, it's more about envy than anything else; and also reflects Oracle's philosophy about Java (something they weren't involved in creating) as "their property".

Personally, I hope the judgement is for some portion of the license fees they may have been due (400m) as opposed to the 8.8g they're going after - which represents all profits that Google have made from using Java in a way that Oracle never thought of. However, since they've specifically decided not to pursue the licensing part of the total, I wouldn't have too much problem with them losing this time around as well.

By contrast, Sun's CEO congratulated Google when Android came out with some comment about rocket boosters.

Winston



thank you so much for nice explanation.
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic