Hello David,
it's good, that you visit this forum, so we can ask questions.
But I have rather a feedback. A bad one, if you don't mind.
I have tested the free 1Z0-808 exam. It is free, but I still want my money back (using your 100% money back guarantee). I have made screenshots on my way through, but we will not need them, I think.
What I don't like about your mock exams (no precedence, just to write down, until I still remember):
1. countdown doesn't end after I submitted the
test
2. don't like the look and feel of the exam website
--- i.e. why did you pack the answers into textarea-fields?
3. text copy is not allowed
--- your website informs us about 100% working and tested code, but I can't even try it out in my
IDE
4. all answers are multiple choice answers, even if there should be only one answer
--- the questions don't tell you, how much answers
you should give
--- even worse, they confuse you, because they are in... (see the next point)
5. a bad English. I have a bad English too, but you have a website and selling your software!
--- answers like "the output could be" is not the way an answer should sound. If the code doesn't compile, I can imagine a correct output after I manage to correct the compiler error
--- a question, asking "What are true?" has only one correct answer
--- "this method has marked with... access modifier"
6. in the OCA free test, having only 25 questions, we have topics, that are not in the OCA but in the OCP exam
--- Like custom functional interfaces, Instant, Duration
I don't understand, why do you sell this software for such high prices if it is raw? It costs more, than Enthuware mock exams. And Enthuware has proven it's usability and usefulness (see the branch "certification results" on JavaRanch)
And please don't say, that it is only a free exam like this. The free tests are the face of your software, it is your advertising. And if the advertising is bad, then what should we expect from the real mock exams for 39.99 USD?
Kind regards
Viktor