An erratum in errata OCAJP 8 Sybex?

[Ganesh Patekar]

In the errata table, the error column for Page xli, chapter Intro It says:

#10 – “Reference one points to g1” should be “Reference two points to g2”  I think It's typo, It should be

#10 – “Reference one points to g1” should be “Reference one points to g2”

[Ganesh Patekar]

OCAJP 8 Sybex, Answer to Assessment Test, Page no xli, answer of Q.13 on line 3rd where It says  

"Since luck is not less than 10, the second expression, --luck, will be evaluated,"  I think It should be "Since luck is not greater than 10, the second expression, --luck, will be evaluated,"  because we've used > operator here

int luck = 10;
if( ( luck > 10 ? luck++ : --luck) < 10 )

Source: OCAJP 8 Sybex

[Jeanne Boyarsky]

Ganesh Patekar wrote:In the errata table, the error column for Page xli, chapter Intro It says:

#10 – “Reference one points to g1” should be “Reference two points to g2”  I think It's typo, It should be

#10 – “Reference one points to g1” should be “Reference one points to g2”

Correct and fixed. (I'm often rushing when posting errata)

[Jeanne Boyarsky]

Ganesh Patekar wrote:OCAJP 8 Sybex, Answer to Assessment Test, Page no xli, answer of Q.13 on line 3rd where It says  

"Since luck is not less than 10, the second expression, --luck, will be evaluated,"  I think It should be "Since luck is not greater than 10, the second expression, --luck, will be evaluated,"  because we've used > operator here

Agreed and logged

[Ganesh Patekar]

Thank you Jeanne