Originally posted by Rick Reumann:
After doing even more research, I think what I was doing in JBoss wasn't really standard. Not positive though.
You are right, JBoss allows you to declared those shared libraries in the application.xml file as a <
java> module. But ideally, the < java> module is meant to represent an "application-client" in J2EE.
You might want to have a look at
this article, which speaks of packaging utility classes in a portable J2EE application.