|
![]() |
Campbell Ritchie wrote:That suggests to me that you want to have all the part as fields in the Snowman class. Now you can implement setLocation() by moving from the old location and implement move() methods on all the parts.
Campbell Ritchie wrote:That suggests to me that you want to have all the part as fields in the Snowman class. Now you can implement setLocation() by moving from the old location and implement move() methods on all the parts.
Campbell Ritchie wrote:Maybe you will have to pass the speech bubble text to a constructor or setXXX() method.
Campbell Ritchie wrote:
Campbell Ritchie wrote:
All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable.
Knute Snortum wrote:Just one point: using an underscore (_) in variable names is frowned upon and, I believe, is now deprecated. And either way, using any character to signal that a variable is a field is frowned upon.
Java 8 Tutorial wrote:The convention, however, is to always begin your variable names with a letter, not "$" or "_". Additionally, the dollar sign character, by convention, is never used at all. You may find some situations where auto-generated names will contain the dollar sign, but your variable names should always avoid using it. A similar convention exists for the underscore character; while it's technically legal to begin your variable's name with "_", this practice is discouraged.
Practice only makes habit, only perfect practice makes perfect.—every music teacher ever
Practice mindfully by doing the right things and doing things right.— Junilu
[How to Ask Questions] [How to Answer Questions]
...Additionally, the dollar sign character, by convention, is never used at all. You may find some situations where auto-generated names will contain the dollar sign, but your variable names should always avoid using it. A similar convention exists for the underscore character; while it's technically legal to begin your variable's name with "_", this practice is discouraged.
[Arguing with an engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours, you realize that he likes it] [Learn code first? no we apply to learn programming(or also)first thanks]
Campbell Ritchie.... [/tt wrote:isn't a keyword, but is it a reserved word?
[Arguing with an engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours, you realize that he likes it] [Learn code first? no we apply to learn programming(or also)first thanks]
No.Harry Kar wrote:. . . In Java keyword Vs reserved word have the semantics as in common knowledge? . . .
Campbell Ritchie wrote:
No.Harry Kar wrote:. . . In Java keyword Vs reserved word have the semantics as in common knowledge? . . .
The keywords are all devoid of semantic content, but they have syntactic significance and may (eight of them) determine types of things.
The three traditional reserved words had semantic content but didn't determine syntax. All the keywords were also reserved.
... have the semantics as in common...
The keywords are all devoid of semantic content, but they have syntactic significance
Keywords: are actual(=part of the actual languages syntax) reserved words
and may (eight of them) determine types of things
There are some languages which have non‑reserved keywords.
[Arguing with an engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours, you realize that he likes it] [Learn code first? no we apply to learn programming(or also)first thanks]
boolean byte,, char, double, float, int, long and short.Harry Kar wrote:. . .
and may (eight of them) determine types of things
what are they 8?
Old Fortran, for one.There are some languages which have non‑reserved keywords.
such as...?
[Arguing with an engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours, you realize that he likes it] [Learn code first? no we apply to learn programming(or also)first thanks]
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater. |