It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:uml tutorial
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
Remember to be nice. Your comment could be interpreted as sarcastic.
Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:Ever tried Google? Or any searchengine for that mather?
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
I only had a few minutes' look at that link, but I thought it looked good.Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:uml tutorial
Campbell Ritchie wrote:
I only had a few minutes' look at that link, but I thought it looked good.Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:uml tutorial
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
Sometimes the only way things ever got fixed is because people became uncomfortable.
Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:I'll make a sketch with some explanation myself
Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:So did I, so sorry to disapoint you but I'm not gonna waiste my time with writting my own examples, everything you need to know is in there ...
FirstRuleDoNoHarm wrote:...If you're in a hurry and don't have the time to do these things or find yourself becoming impatient with the original poster, don't post an answer. ...
If the question is unclear, ask the questioner to clarify without sounding rude. This will help them find out what exactly they are asking, as this sometimes is a big challenge.
salvin francis wrote:
The above commitment you gave contradicts with the post below (I have read Campbell's post too, but I feel that an outright denial is rude)
FirstRuleDoNoHarm wrote:...If you're in a hurry and don't have the time to do these things or find yourself becoming impatient with the original poster, don't post an answer. ...
If the question is unclear, ask the questioner to clarify without sounding rude. This will help them find out what exactly they are asking, as this sometimes is a big challenge.
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
It's good to be able to use someting, it's better to understand how it works.
www.goanation.net
But all Accounts have an account number, so maybe it woud be better to have that field in the generic and maybe abstract Account class. In which case it would be a bad idea for the subclasses to have a number field, too. The same would apply to BIC etc., which are presumably analogous to what I know as the sort code.Daniel Demesmaecker wrote:. . . Do you notice any mistake? Take a look at the class diagram example. You can notice that the attributes ‘account_number’ and ‘routing_number’ are different for the Checkings and Savings account. As a result, it makes more sense to put those attributes in their respective classes, rather than in the more generic class ‘Account’. . . .
[Arguing with an engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours, you realize that he likes it] [Learn code first? no we apply to learn programming(or also)first thanks]
pie. tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
https://coderanch.com/wiki/718759/books/Building-World-Backyard-Paul-Wheaton
|