• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • paul wheaton
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Mikalai Zaikin
Bartenders:
  • Lou Hamers
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven

Sybe:Java OCA/OCP Practice Tests Chapter 10: OCA Practice Exam question 29 mock answer

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 215
11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sybe:Java OCA/OCP Practice Tests Chapter 10: OCA Practice Exam question 29 mock answer
"Note that if the super() statement was removed, it would still not compile since this would be a recursive constructor call."
The constructor public Trouble(int deep) {       contains this();  and not this(1); so it is NOT a recursive constructor call and compiles if super(false); is removed.   By alinvlad05
 
author & internet detective
Posts: 41967
911
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Confirmed and added to the errata. I checked the Java 11 (819) book. While the question is in there the errata was fixed in that edition
 
Doody calls. I would really rather that it didn't. Comfort me wise and sterile tiny ad:
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/wiki/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic