• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

CopyHelper/Access Beans

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 16
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello all,

I am just wondering which method is more faster/a better design principle..

The session beans(facades) and the entity beans live in the same JVM, so session beans can use the Local interfaces to call the entity beans, but the problem is that we can't use the Factory/Access beans(that are generated with the remote interfaces).

The Factory/Access beans have a lot of methods that will greatly reduce the developement time(lookups,creates,set/synchxxx methods)..so which is the best methodology to use? To bear the network traffic and use copy helpers / use local interfaces but go through all the setMethods?.


sanjay.
sanjay.
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic