Mike Simmons wrote:
Tim Holloway wrote:and since I'm pretty sure that "int.class" isn't valid
It is valid - it's how we talk about parameter types and return types with reflection, allowing us to distinguish between int.class and Integer.class. There's even a Void.class just to allow us to know that a method returns void.
Vaseem Mohammed wrote:With the new licensing policies would there be challenges in adopting Java?
miha zoubek wrote:right now my request looks like:
I need to change this to: