Tomas Hertzman

Greenhorn
+ Follow
since Jan 30, 2006
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
0
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
0
Received in last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Tomas Hertzman

Hi.
Since I'm no Java Expert maybe I shouldn't be posting in this thread but in this case would just want to recommend the book Head First Servlets & JSP to the guy with the problem. An excellent book on the topic. And while at it, maybe Head First EJB also.....
(Go Kathy!!!)
[ February 04, 2006: Message edited by: Tomas Hertzman ]
18 years ago
OK. I see. I thougt that you only added functionality to a new JRE to preserve compatibility. Seems like a economical issue then.....
Thank you.

/Tomas
18 years ago
Hello.
I just bought the books "Head First Java" and "Head First Servlets & JSP". Great books by the way (makes me laugh my a-- of sometimes ).
I the book about servlets and JSP there is a quite interesting thing about CGI and JSP (where at the end JSP is better of course . My question is: why is a page like this (about Java) made with CGI? A little contradicting don't you think?

/Tomas
18 years ago
Hi.
Maybe a strange question but I felt that here is the place I can ask!
We are using a Java App at work (an editor tool for text documents)that requiers us to use JRE 1.3.1_XX (some version number). Does anyone here knows why you would want to do that? We can't even start the app if we have a higher version of JRE installed. Isn't the JRE backwords compatible? I mean, as far as I know you do get quite a speed increase in the latest JRE versions so it is really a shame to do this kind of thing. Or can anyone think of any reason why?
18 years ago