Patrick Dung wrote:Why we should use the Quarkus framework/platform? What is the advantage of using compared with other products?
Raul Rios wrote:Hey Alex and Jason,
Congratulations for your new book.
I'm currently researching options to migrate a classic JAX-RS application made with Jersey to a microservices arquitecture based application. Is it Quarkus a good fit for this migration project?
Regarding your book, I have seen that it assumes the reader to have knowledge about technologies like JPA, JAX-RS, CDI, Eclipse Microprofile or Eclipse Vert.x. I have experience with some of these technologies (JAX-RS or CDI) but not others. Do you consider an essential requirement to have this knowledge before reading your book?
Thanks in advance.
About the book: can I learn from it how to architect my code so testing it can be easily done? dao-s, etc? I'm using weblogic, any tips for testing on this one?
-are there specific advantage / disadvantage to using arquillian as the same framework for all the types [unit, web or functional, integration] of testing?
-is there a 'stock' pdf-type of report that combines all the testing activities into an 'executive summary' type of presentation?
-are there additional features, such as code-coverage reports, that integrate all the testing activities into a single code-coverage (i.e. this part was tested by unit testing and service testing, but this part was only tested by service testing)?