Vincent Vauban wrote:The step 1 is recommended but not mandatory.
I recommend you do it, now that the course is free.
Frits Walraven wrote:
Yes! It is really helpful. That is what i am referring . And i have enthuware mock as well .
So as it need both methods to have same client's transaction, It cant be in BMT, because if it is BMT then client's transaction is suspending.
Am i correct?
Yes!
Frits Walraven wrote: Yes!
Frits Walraven wrote:
Rajitha Gunawardhane wrote:I am sorry. It is my mistake. But not a small one. I will follow it.
No problem.
Are you by any chance reading my notes? You can find them here: OCEEJBD-Links
You might want to check chapter 5.4.3 and 5.4.4. What do you think is the answer after reading those paragraphs?
Frits Walraven wrote:Please Quote Your Sources.
Rajitha Gunawardhane wrote:Hi All,
It has mentioned that usage of static fields are restricted in EJB. But when i created a non final static filed in Stateful ejb, it worked without any error.
So does that means container not giving any error with these kind of things? It is up to the developer to use it properly?
I know the reason for this is that in a distributed environment it is difficult to handle static fields if there are multiple JVMs.
Thank you.
Frits Walraven wrote:No, you won't find any EJB 2.x questions.