Jeff Verdegan wrote:
sanjay kumar gupta wrote:Most studies agree that pointers are one of the primary features that enable programmers to inject bugs into their code.
Given that structures are gone, and arrays and strings are objects, the need for pointers to these constructs goes away. Thus, Java has no pointer data types. Any task that would require arrays, structures, and pointers in C can be more easily and reliably performed by declaring objects and arrays of objects.
Instead of complex pointer manipulation on array pointers, you access arrays by their arithmetic indices. The Java run-time system checks all array indexing to ensure indices are within the bounds of the array.
You no longer have dangling pointers and trashing of memory because of incorrect pointers, because there are no pointers in Java.
This sounds like a quote from somewhere. If it is, please give proper credit to the source. If it is in fact your own thoughts in your own words, please accept my apologies and carry on.![]()
Akhilesh Trivedi wrote:If you are looking for a variety of users, then put a generic/common/basic/typical thing.
Akhilesh Trivedi wrote:Are you trying to say that you are giving excel format to a user who doesn't know to use excel? In that I would prefer to give him HTML/PDF/CSV.