ajith srikukan

Greenhorn
+ Follow
since Aug 19, 2008
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
colombo
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
0
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
0
Received in last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by ajith srikukan

i think, doing SCJP 1.6 is better. and there isn't any big different, just a small difference is there
follow the links to get more information ... SCJP 1.6 , SCJP 1.5.

i did SCJP 1.6 but most of the mock exams that i did on SCJP 1.5 then referred the extra things...

Good Luck....
well done

Congratulations
14 years ago
Congrats!
Go forward
14 years ago

Phone Myat Kyaw wrote: your opinions for the exam ?






Hi Phone Myat Kyaw ,
through the practice, you can get more knowledge then reading the whole notes again and again( if you have more time, you can go through the whole notes). so my advice is that do more and more questions that will help you during exam. Here you can find many questions including Devaka's Exam Lab. Go through the questions and finally you will find the effort of this method in the final exam ....

Best of Luck ...

ajith
Congratulations ...
14 years ago

sudipto shekhar wrote:
Mr. Devaka Cooray himself and his excellent creation Exam Lab (I never got more than 54% )



Yes, shekhar ... The Exam Lab simulator is amazing...
do you know one, i got only 53% (the average) but in the sun exam i got 79% ...

congratulation...
14 years ago

Ankit Garg wrote:Congrats Ajith

Great Score



Thanks Ankit Garg ....
14 years ago

reji singh wrote:congratulations on your success. Great!



thanks reji singh

14 years ago


Thanks you all members of JavaRanch....

each post int this form is amazing .....

again thanks to every one, specially to Devaka Cooray for the ExamLab 6.....
14 years ago

Devaka Cooray wrote:

reji singh wrote:Hi Devaka,

I believe the problem for vista has something to do with MS JET driver for data access. Are you using JET 3.5 driver in the extract executable. By default vista comes with 4.0 --- 4.0.9704.0 Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008

Also, when I run the extract for JET set-up it does not copy couple of dlls. not sure where am i heading



Hi reji,

Thank you for your observation .The problem is not *only* with the JET driver access. It is just a one problem only. But there are few other problems with it including the Vista registry access and much more.

Devaka.







Thanks a lot..... it was amazing
I tried it in vista. it works without any problem but one thing i did was , i didn't install the JET (i don't know whether it correct or not)

again thanks a lot deveka

Ryan Beckett wrote:In scenarios 1 and 2, the main method executed first, and in the 3rd it waits until both client threads are finished. If you run scenario 1 and 2 more, the output should change. Threads are unpredictable.





thanks Ryan, i got the idae .....

one more thing ... in the 3rd scenario the main thread will wait until other two threads finish and both methods are synchronized so each thread(one and two) loop will run 1000 times. this implies , the loop will run 2000 times but the output is between 1000 and 2000 why is that?




Ankit Garg wrote:Hi Ajith, welcome to Javaranch.

Ajith at ranch we have a rule that if you post a code from a mock exam, then you've to QuoteYourSources. So please tell us from where did you take that question so that we can help you...



http://nikojava.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/scjp-mock-exam-for-threads/
question 58




can anyone explain the reason behind the output ...

1. one.start();

//output "0"

2.one.start();
two.start();

//output "0"

3. one.start();
two.start();
one.join();
two.join();
//output varies between 1000 and 2000