Cagatay Civici wrote:You can get commercial support for PrimeFaces if support is important for your company;
http://www.primefaces.org/support.html
There is also a very active community forum;
http://forum.primefaces.org/
Also check out real life experiences of PrimeFaces Users;
http://www.primefaces.org/testimonials.html
And google trends;
http://www.google.com/trends/?q=PrimeFaces,RichFaces,IceFaces,OpenFaces&ctab=0&geo=all&date=2012&sort=0
Still better thing to do is do a pilot project with candidate technologies during evaluations and decide yourself
Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:
In general, it isn't useless. If it gives you a large number of false positives, it is. Who is going to keep going through the warnings to see when a real one shows up?
Ernest Friedman-Hill wrote:"Firebug" is a Javascript debugger for Firefox; I think you're talking about "Findbugs", which is a static source code analyzer, yes?
Anyway, if you had a thousand classes, and each of them had ten unused private methods, and the compiled code for each of those took up 100 bytes, then your JAR file would be one megabyte larger than it needed to be. A larger-then-needed JAR file will take longer to load than a smaller one; that's honestly the only measurable performance problem that I can imagine due to unused private methods.
Findbugs has many, many, MANY checks that it can do; please don't fall into the common trap of believing that each of those checks is actually useful for your team. Use the checks that make sense; ignore (turn off) the ones that don't. This one definitely doesn't.
Performance - Private method is never called
Plugin: findbugs Key: UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD
This private method is never called. Although it is possible that the method will be invoked through reflection, it is more likely that the method is never used, and should be removed.
Kunal Lakhani wrote:Eduardo Yañez Parareda, The stack trace i printed is correct.
Kunal Lakhani wrote:yes Eduardo Yañez Parareda. That's only generating 1001.
Christophe Verré , yes i am entering values in t5, (value-123)
Kunal Lakhani wrote:
The id generated is 1001.