Rob Prime wrote:
Damilola Okuboyejo wrote:
Rob Prime wrote:
Damilola Okuboyejo wrote:d@
Please UseRealWords. It took me a minute to figure out you meant "that".
thanks Rob
and sorry about the short-code ''d@''
got d clarification.
What makes you think that, if "d@" isn't accepted as a replacement for "that", that "d" would be acceptable as replacement for "the"? You haven't even read the UseRealWords page, have you?
Andrew Monkhouse wrote:
Vishal Kashyap wrote:C# is also a platform Independent language
It's only truly platform independent if you count Microsoft Windows XP as a different platform to Microsoft Windows 7 and they are both different platforms from Microsoft Windows Vista ...
Try and get a copy of the Microsoft .Net CLI for any non-Microsoft platform: not going to happen. The best you can hope for is the independently created Mono and DotGNU systems. And even then you have to hope that these independent developers have implemented enough of the Microsoft .Net CLI to meet your needs; and that they have either developed a release for your platform or that you can compile it yourself on your platform; and that they have not infringed on any of Microsoft's IP (which could get them shut down).
As others have mentioned, there are some really good things about C#, and different requirements call for different tools.
abalfazl hossein wrote:
This code thorws an exception in this line:Arrays.sort(array);
why?
Rob Prime wrote:
Damilola Okuboyejo wrote:d@
Please UseRealWords. It took me a minute to figure out you meant "that".
I'll have a counter example that does show the difference between protected and default access:
Protected members can only be accessed on instances of the sub class, not on instances of the super class. Because I changed the reference type (and actual type) it started working.
Avishkar Nikale wrote:There is an example on page 35 in SCJP Study Guide by Kathy & Bert which can help you understand this.