I still can not beleive that you guys are spending so much time and energy trying to remove a link to the assignment -- which BTW IS NOT THE SOLUTION
For god sake where is cheating involved here ??? This is sooo ridiculous. There are dozens of thread in this forum where you can find answers that have been asked in the exam, and this should be considered as cheating.
Reusing some architecture from Pet Store this could be also considered as cheating, ... but reading the content of the assignement... please come on ! it's a like reading the objectives of the exam, don't you think ???
Anyway I was glad to had this link to look at the assignement even before I got part 1. That gave me a good idea of what I should expect for part 2.
So in my opinion the problem is not in having this link available or not, the problem is to have SUN creating a set of new assignements, and this is where you should put you efforts into
, rather than poluting this forum with dozens of post around a link that contained in my opinion 'the objectives' of the 2nd part.
I hope that in the futur the content level of this forum will improve a little bit...
And yes the link with the assignment has been removed
(the link was )http://www.reusablesoftwarecomponents.com/Seminar/index.html)
... but I am sure that they are many other way to get an idea of what the assignement is, like simply asking a friend who got certified
my 2 cents,
[This message has been edited by Christophe Testi (edited November 11, 2001).]