Campbell Ritchie wrote:Please always tell us the source of such information, so we can read it for ourselves.
Sounds like something you want to do in a separate thread (at which point it ceases to be a “beginning” topic, so I shall add you to different fora). Not sure what you would do but find out about completable futures. One reference is Urma Fusco and Mycroft Modern Java in Action (Manning). It's also the older edition of that book, called Java8 in Action.
Kristina Hansen wrote:you can not create references at runtime with these: Object a, Object b, Object c,
Marco Behler wrote:A question for all, especially for the video critics like Les Morgan or Sean:
I have been producing quite a few Java screencasts lately ( www.marcobehler.com ) and would honestly appreciate your real opinion (yup positive or negative - also, feel free to send me a PM and I'll give you a temporary free account to watch all videos)
Thanks!
Marco
Jesper de Jong wrote:So, Java 9 is indeed delayed, at least until September: https://coderanch.com/t/680598/java/java-delayed-september
Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:
Jesper de Jong wrote:I think the most likely thing is, when the module system does not get accepted, is that the release of Java 9 will be delayed.
The module system is the one big feature that Java 9 is all about. Without the module system, Java 9 will be no more than a minor update.
Agreed on delays. Java 9 can't physically go out without modules without a major rewrite. Yanking it out isn't easy. So that decision would set back the schedule too. Probably more than hashing out the remaining obstacles.
Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:This is a great question; have a cow.