Junilu Lacar wrote:So these aren't unit tests then? More like contract tests?
Junilu Lacar wrote:If so, there's still a smell of testing at the wrong level. Would you mind showing what a couple of these tests look like in their entirety?
DoubleToIntFunction" is not true. It should say "DoubleToIntFunction and ToIntFunction meet all three of these criteria. As does "ToIntFunction"
Paul Anilprem wrote:OCAJP/OCAPJP 8 will not be "old" for another couple of years at least. Java 8 exams already include some of the most important topics (streams and lambda) so I would not worry too much about it going obsolete anytime soon. It will still be as valuable as it was.
Paul Anilprem wrote:I don't think the new exams (815 and 816) are any more tough that the older (808 and 809) exams but the absence of books and mock exams certainly make them look like so. This will not be a problem in a couple of months time. However, the bigger issue is the focus of the new exams. The new exams focus quite a bit on modularization. But modularization is not yet a clear winner in the industry, IMHO. So, I don't think you would be losing out much by not going for the new exams.