Jeanne Boyarsky

author & internet detective
Marshal
+ Follow
since May 26, 2003
Jeanne likes ...
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
New York
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
645
In last 30 days
22
Total given
99844
Likes
Total received
3727
Received in last 30 days
43
Total given
2667
Given in last 30 days
51
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt Green check
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt Green check

Recent posts by Jeanne Boyarsky

CodeRanch Book Promotions - This Year's Winners


A big Congratulations to all our winners!

See our BookPromotions2017Winners

DateCoverBookAuthor(s)PublisherWinnersStatus
January 2Architecting Modern Java EE ApplicationsSebastian DaschnerPacktRavi Desigan, Tim Holloway, Charles O'Leary, Esteban SuarezSent in winners 1/21/18; Received (1/22/18 Charles O'Leary)
January 9Getting started with Spring Framework: covers Spring 5J Sharma & Ashish SarinCreate SpaceRavi Saluru, J Kilgrow, Ramadan Pajaziti, David SachdevSent in winners 1/21/18
January 23Kubernetes in ActionMarko LuksaManningT Vergilio, Daniel Owen Williams, Jorge Ruiz-Aquino, Tim Holloway  Winner reported received 4/20/18
January 30The Tao of MicroservicesJ Richard RodgerManningDaniel Demesmaecker, Dave Tolls, Ankur R Jain, Brian Burress  Sent in winners 2/11/18; Received (18/4/18, Dave Tolls)
February 6Get Programming with Scala (MEAP only) Daniela SfregolaManningpaul nisset, Alex Khvatov, Will Myers, Thomas Zink  Sent in winner info (3/18/18); Received (Will Myers 18/4/18)
February 13RESTful Service with JAX-RS 2.0 (Lynda three month subscription)Alex TheedomLyndaSatya Priya Sundar, Shantha Dodmane, Pankaj Sonani, Stephan van HulstSent in winner info (3/18/18)
February 27Java SE 9 for the ImpatientCay HorstmannAddison-Wesley ProfessionalJorge Ruiz-Aquino, Aysenur Eroglu, Campbell Ritchie, Andrew McDonald Winner reported received (3/25/18)
March 20Java EE 8 High PerformanceRomain Manni-BucauPacktpaul nisset, Thomas Zink, David Sachdev, Alex ShykhmanWinners sent (4/22/18)
March 27 Java EE 8 - Only What's New (e-book)Alex TheedomLean PublishingClaude Moore, R.J. Arzki, Randy Maddocks, Naresh DonipartiWinners sent (4/19/18); (R.J Arzki - received on 26.04.2018)
April 3Effective JavaJosh BlochAddison-WesleyStephan van Hulst, Rob Spoor, Jorge Ruiz-Aquino, Granit BerishaWinner reported received (4/29/18)
April 10Murach's HTML5 and CSS3Anne Boehm & Zak RuvalcabaMurach  Charles O'Leary, Bear Bibeault, Thomas Zink, Wex WuffleyWinners sent (5/20/18);Received (5/23/18 Charles O'Leary)
April 17Java by Comparison (e-book)Simon Harrer, Jörg Lenhard, Linus DietzPragmatic PressMartin McNicholas, Campbell Ritchie, Norm Radder, Timur Radzhabov Winners sent (5/20/18)
April 24Securing DevOpsJulien VehentManningChun Chu, Rafael Morales, satya Priya Sundar, Noorul Hameed Winners sent (5/20/18)
May 1Kafka Streams in Action  Bill BejeckManningNoorul Hameed, Tim Holloway, Lanny Gilbert, R.J. ArzkiWinners sent (5/20/18)
May 8Testing Java MicroservicesAlex Soto Bueno and Jason PorterManningPaul Ramsden, meenakshi sundar, Stelios Ntilis, Al HobbsWinners sent (7/1/18)
May 22OCP Java SE 8 Programmer II Exam Study GuideKathy Sierra, Bert Bates & Elizabeth RobsonMcGraw-HillNoorul Hameed, Charles O'Leary, Kent O. Johnson, Jonathan DamronWinners sent (7/1/18)
June 5Optimizing JavaBen Evans, James Gough & Chris NewlandO'Reilly Michael Krimgen, Jorge Ruiz-Aquino, Tim Holloway, ludoviko azuajeWinner reported received (7/8/18)
June 5Openshift in ActionJamie Duncan & John OsborneManning paul nisset, Lukas Machacek, Carlos Solano, Timur RadzhabovWinners sent (7/1/18); (Ludoviko A. received on 07/10/18) 
June 12Get Programming with JavaScript NextJ.D. IsaacksManning Bear Bibeault, Cody Biggs, Godfred Kofi, Pete LetkemanWinners sent (7/1/18)
June 12Scala for Java DevelopersToby WestonApress Zach Rode, Lukas Machacek, German Gonzalez-Morris, Janeice DelVecchioWinners sent (7/1/18)
June 19Classic Computer Science Problems in Swift David KopecManning Piet Souris, German Gonzalez-Morris, Kent O. JohnsonWinners sent (7/1/18)
June 26The Quick Python Book, Third EditionNaomi CederManning Timur Radzhabov, Patricia McCormick, paul nisset, Rick SilvaWinners sent (7/30/18)
July 10Redux in ActionMarc Garreau & Will FaurotManningSalil Wadnerkar, Bear Bibeault, Wirianto Djunaidi , Cody BiggsWinners sent (7/30/18)
July 17Machine Learning SystemsJeff SmithManningGerman Gonzalez-Morris, Raj Govindaraju, Zach Rode, Piet SourisWinners sent (7/30/18)
July 17Xamarin in ActionJim BennettManningPete Letkeman, Tim Moores, Kondwani Chipeta, Carlos SolanoWinners sent (7/30/18)
July 24React in ActionMark Tielens ThomasManningPhelipe Maia, Lanny Gilbert, Bear Bibeault, Stephan van HulstWaiting for winners info
July 31OCA Java Programmer 8 Fundamentals 1Z0-808 (e-book)Hanumant DeshmukhEnthuwareNoorul Hameed, Piet Souris, Randy Maddocks, Esteban Suarez Waiting for winners info
August 14Bad Programming Practices 101 (e-book)Karl BeecherApress Ganesh Patekar, Randy Too , Manish Pamnani , Chris WhitcombWaiting for winners info


Note: All dates in mm/dd/yyyy format.

Go back to the main BookPromotions page.

For questions about this page or to schedule a promotion, contact: bookpromotion AT javaranch DOT com
8 hours ago
Scheduled promotions:

Note: We can run more than one promo in a given week, so check for updates.

Starting DateCoverBookAuthor(s)PublisherCodeRanch Forum
August 21Create an Uber Clone in 7 Days: Build a real world full stack mobile app in JavaShai Almog  Codename One Academy Android
August 28Available
September 4Software Design X-Rays (e-book)Adam Tornhill  Pragmatic Press Android
September 11Available
September 18Available
September 25Available


Go back to the main BookPromotions page.
8 hours ago
First, a big thanks to Karl Beecher for being here to promote Bad Programming Practices 101 (e-book).

The winners are:

Ganesh Patekar
Randy Too
Manish Pamnani
Chris Whitcomb

Please send your snail mail address to bookpromotion AT javaranch DOT com. To ensure the quickest response, please provide the following:

Your name (first and last - if your CodeRanch name is different, please include both your real name and Ranch name)
Email
Country (needed even if requesting an e-book)


Also, please include the following as the subject of your Email.

Promo Winner - Bad Programming Practices 101 (e-book) - Tuesday, August 14th, 2018


Image from https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com

As noted in the Book Promotion Eligibility Requirements and Legal type stuff, the winners have 8 days to submit their information. Within 3 days of receipt of your email, we will reply to let you know we got it. If you don't hear back, the goat might have eaten your email. Please let us know by posting in the Ranch Office so we can check on it. Once you have received your copy please let us know by editing the Book Promotions Winners Page and updating the 'Status' column to say you have it.

Thanks and congrats to all the winners.
8 hours ago

Junilu Lacar wrote:If things are working for you the way they are, you probably should just go with it. Don't fix it if it ain't broke.


Agreed. Still want to understand it though. So I should read up on chartering it sounds like.

Nhien Nguyen wrote:Im studying for OCP using Sybex books. I just wondering how's the difficulty of the review questions at the end of chapter compare to Enthuware mock tests and the real exam.
I have done review question (1st time) in the book quiet well compared to the OCA book (which were challenging, really hard, but good for studying).
Thanks.


On all chapters or the first chapter. Because the material in chapter 1 is a lot easier than some of the others!

Junilu Lacar wrote:

Joshua Kerievsky wrote:Product management has a voice in this community, but they don’t “own” prioritization or planning. Developers and testers and UX people also have a voice in planning and prioritization.



I don't really understand this. Lots of people have a voice in prioritizing. We give input to our Product Owner. On features and tech debt and dependencies and suggestions. But it is still his call. Making all decisions by committee feels incredibly time consuming given the number of competing demands we have.
Congrats Simon! Note that the OCP is a lot harder than the OCA.

Have a cow for putting the pass date in code .
19 hours ago
Daniel,
I don't see why extracting your jars would be a noticeable performance difference. Having a lot of delegation between classes is also unlikely to be the problem.  Calling the database a lot is likely to be a problem.

Yes, you can post a link to github. Note that we are all volunteers and aren't going to read a ton of code. So please post the highlights. Which specific part of the application is taking the longest. (Add logging if you aren't sure.)
19 hours ago

Junilu Lacar wrote:Seeing all these variations is great from a learning standpoint but I can see why Jeanne is deciding to stick with her two-loop (and probably) more imperative version.


Yup. I'm glad I posted for learning though!
19 hours ago
I'm not sure what you mean by a "real" object. It creates a proxy that has different behavior than the one you are trying to replace.
19 hours ago
I was lucky. My family was going on vacation the next morning and I had taken that day off. So I was home. I remember walking to the store to get some extra apple juice. Carvel was giving away free ice cream. I also remember people standing at intersections with snow shovels directing traffic. And it worked. New York drivers honored the snow shovels for when to stop and go!

We got power back around noon the next day. (waited until the power was back to leave on the trip.)

Tim: I'm also spoiled. We have underground power transmission. Making it extremely rare to have a local power outage.
19 hours ago
THere's a pets vs cattle analogy in the cloud computing space:

In the old way of doing things, we treat our servers like pets, for example Bob the mail server. If Bob goes down, it’s all hands on deck. The CEO can’t get his email and it’s the end of the world. In the new way, servers are numbered, like cattle in a herd. For example, www001 to www100. When one server goes down, it’s taken out back, shot, and replaced on the line.



When I posted about this on twitter, the leader of the NY Java Sig wrote:

Frank Greco wrote:If I was a cow, I'd give you an evil stare.

19 hours ago

Satyaprakash Joshii wrote:
Asked by whom? The product owner? And who pushs back?



Architect.
These are different questions. Is the architect asking or pushing back?

Satyaprakash Joshii wrote:Yes exactly. Some sprint goals are not met at end of every sprint and one has to give explanation of why?


Well you know why. Someone is dumping too much work in the sprint. I think the key is not agreeing to it at sprint planning. If the team says, there is too much work in the sprint and doesn't complete it, that is what you say. Then there can be a discussion about what commitment means. Because you delivered what you expected; less than the work in the sprint.

Satyaprakash Joshii wrote:

sounds like your company isn't really doing Scrum and just using some of the terminology.



Is it a good idea that when they are adding tasks for the Spring and they are about to say why so much time for this work which looks less from higher level but looks bigger on knowing implementation details, show them the work break down structure and tell them see this all adds up to those many hours so it will take this much time? But in that case how would you be knowing the work breakdown structure on the day sprint starts when every moment until the day before you were trying to complete the previous sprint tasks which did not even complete. Work breakdown structure would come when you have a day to think about the what would be the low level tasks involved for the user story.


Do you use planning poker cards to estimate as a team? If so, all of the developers saying it takes that much time, it probably does. A high level estimate doesn't take a work breakdown structure. 

Also, you have data on how long things took in previous sprints. Point to that.
19 hours ago
Joshua Kerievsky wrote an article about elminimating the product owner role.

My team have a lot of customers (we are an internal team and our customers are other development teams.). While the developers on the team regularly talk to them, we talk about technical things. Not priorities. The Product Owner negotiates with other managers and prioritizes. This seems like a hugely important role. And one that would take up a lot of the rest of the team's time if he wasn't doing it.

I'm curious if our team's customer base is why this idea seems crazy to me.

Pete Letkeman wrote:So, I could in theory bring my own meat product if I wanted to right?


Yes


Pete Letkeman wrote:Would you be able to not consume any meat or dairy products for seven consecutive days?


Meat - if I planned really well, yes.
Dairy - definitely not.
20 hours ago