Sasmito Adibowo

Greenhorn
+ Follow
since Dec 30, 2004
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
In last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Sasmito Adibowo

At last.. after trying to register in the web links the second time they finally e-mailed me with a password to download the logo. Surely beats the alternative of sending international snail-mail.. ^_^

Btw, the website said that they provide TIF also, but there was none in the ZIP file. To open an EPS you can use GSview -- just take a screenshot of the window, crop, and save to whatever bitmap format you want. I know it's kinda stupid to do it that way, but it works.. ;-)
Guess what, I've sent another email this time to who2contact@sun.com and this time there's a Monica Green that sent me exactly the same boilerplate letter that Shaeron sent

--- cut ---
Hello,

Sun Certification has launched a new Java logo. Please go to the below site in order to request your logo:
*
SUN CERTIFIED MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-mobile&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED** DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-dev&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED PROGRAMMER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-prog&Page=requestclick
*

SUN CERTIFIED BUSINESS COMPONENT DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-business&Page=requestclick
*
SUN CERTIFIED ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-entarch&Page=requestclick
*
SUN CERTIFIED WEB COMPONENT DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-webcomp&Page=requestclick
*
SUN CERTIFIED DEVELOPER FOR JAVA WEB SERVICES* http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-webserv&Page=requestclick


Select the "More Information/Request Logo" button highlighted in blue in the center of the page. This will take you to the Logo Agreement that you must agree to prior to receiving your logo. You will then need to completely fill out the form with your personal information. Once completed, you will receive a reply from our logo team within two business days.

We currently are providing one Java logo for all five Java Technology certifications. You will receive both a black and white version, and one with color. You may use either logo of your choice.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thank you,

The Certification Team



----- Original Message -----
Date: Sunday, April 2, 2006 7:38 pm
Subject: Request logo licensing form
To: who2contact@sun.com
Cc: suncert@Thomson.com

> Dear,
>
>
>
> My Prometric ID is sr1756848 and my Candidate ID is SUN152610. I have
> passed the SCJP, SCJD, and SCEA certifications.
>
> I would like to license the Sun Certified Professional logo for the
> aforementioned credentials for my personal stationary, but it seems
> thatthe corresponding licensing form (provided in my certifications
> pack)that I signed was lost in the mail. Where can I obtain an
> electronicversion of these licensing forms so that I could print,
> sign, and send them again?
>
>
>
> This problem was raised to the support request box found in
> http://www.certmanager.net/sun as Incident 971962406 and I was only
> pointed to a list of web links that requests me to already signed the
> paper before proceeding - seems that they took the problem
> differently.
>
>
> I've raised this matter since several weeks ago and yet to have a
> satisfactory reply.
>

--- cut ---

I'm starting to wonder whether my wording is not clear enough for them to understand or simply that Shareon & Monica are really e-mail autoresponders
[ April 03, 2006: Message edited by: Sasmito Adibowo ]
Help...!

I just lost my license form for SCEA logo ( (the one I'm suppose to sign and send to get a password to download a logo). Where can I download a PDF (or some other e-paper) version of this form to sign & send it?


I've contacted suncert@thomson.com and only get this (maybe outdated?) reply:

--- cut ---
Dear Sasmito,
Thank you for contacting Thomson Prometric.

Sun Certification has launched a new Java logo. Please go to the appropiate site in order to request your logo:

*SUN CERTIFIED MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-mobile&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED** DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-dev&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED PROGRAMMER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-prog&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED BUSINESS COMPONENT DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-business&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-entarch&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED WEB COMPONENT DEVELOPER FOR THE JAVA 2 PLATFORM*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-webcomp&Page=requestclick

*SUN CERTIFIED DEVELOPER FOR JAVA WEB SERVICES*

http://logos.sun.com/logosite.jsp?Category=third&Logo=java-cert-webserv&Page=requestclick

Select the "More Information/Request Logo" button highlighted in blue in the center of the page. This will take you to the Logo Agreement that you must agree to prior to receiving your logo. You will then need to completely fill out the form with your personal information. Once completed, you will receive a reply from our logo team within two business days.

We currently are providing one Java logo for all five Java Technology certifications. You will receive both a black and white version, and one with color. You may use either logo of your choice.

If we can be of further assistance to you, please respond to this email.

Thank you for testing with Prometric!

Sincerely,
Shareon
SUN CertManager Support
suncert@Thomson.com

--- cut ---

It seems that they didn't get it that I'm a non-US resident, must use the snail mail technology to register and need a new copy of the license agreement form.

Btw, isn't it supposed to be a different logo for each credential? I've signed the form for SCJD and got a "Developer" logo.

(Just for the curious, I'm _really_ certified and can e-mail publish my credentials should you request it).

Thanks
Hi All,

I'm working on my SCEA Part II assignment using Poseidon CE. When I tried to draw the component diagrams the component symbols came out different. Poseidon only draws a simple rectangle with the <<component>> stereotype already in place, instead of the regular rectangle with two tabs on the left.

My questions are:

1. Is this Poseidon component style "UML Compliant" ? How "compliant" it is? Is it of the correct syntax?

2. Can I somehow configure Poseidon to churn out the more "regular" style of component symbols? The one with two tabs? Please?


Perhaps this is a bit OOT but since it is for SCEA, I feel that it is more relevant here.

TIA.
Since a degenerate itinerary consists of one flight, it may be useful to think an itinerary as being composed recursively of

flights/segments. Thus the part of the Prepare Itinerary use case that selects flights and seats may be executed recursively.

My idea is this:

1. User enters departure and return, say from point A to point Z
and their respective preferred times

2. The system does a graph search and responds with a list like this:

Option 1: FBN001 Departure A Arrival Z,
total cost: $$$ to $$$
Option 2: FBN002 Departure A Arrival B,
FBN003, Departure B Arrival Z, total cost: $$ to $$
Option 3: FBN004 Departure A Arrival C,
FBN005 Departure C Arrival D,
FBN006 Departure D Arrival Z,
total cost: $ to $

... and so on, with thegaps between departure and arrival times
for each segment are less than one hour.

3. The customer selects Option 2

4. The customer selects the seat numbers desired for FBN002 and FBN003.

5. ...etc. and then the itinerary is saved w/o being paid first.


Let's just say that the customer changes his/her mind and executes the change itinerary use case..

1. The system lists the itineraries of the customer

Itinerary 1: ...
Itinerary 2: ...
Itinerary 3: FBN002 Departure A Arrival B,
FBN003, Departure B Arrival Z,
total cost: $$ to $$
Itinerary 4: ...

2. The customer selects Itinerary 3.

3. The system displays a list of menu

Change Itinerary 3, please select the segments to change:

1) FBN002 Departure A Arrival B, cost: $ [change]
2) FBN003 Departure B Arrival Z, cost: $ [change]

4. The customer selects segment 2 to change, then the system
recursively executes a part of the Prepare Itinerary use case,
defaulting the departure and arrival times set from B to Z.
It might respond with a list like:

Option 1: FBN007 Departure B Arrival D,
FBN006 Departure D Arrival Z,
total cost: $-$
Option 2: FBN008 Departure B Arrival E,
FBN009 Departure E Arrival F,
FBN010 Departure F Arrival Z,
total cost: $-$

5. The customer selects Option 2

6. etc..

Note that the range of costs reflects the fact that there are two price options for each flight, first class or coach.


So, i guess the problem is solved then?
The "change itinerary" sequence diagram has only 17 objects (lifelines, including the Client actor), but it is already very big in my opinion. But it spans 5x2 A4 portrait pages (using 8-10pt Arial fonts) already. I've included the JSPs as object, the front controller, as well as the transfer objects involved.

The "prepare itinerary" sequence diagram is even worse.

Since the example in Mark Cade's book also include the JSPs and their controller, I opt to do the same in the assignment. But then this raise the question, should I also draw the same diagram for the GUI clients? The interaction from the point of the UI's controller backwards will be mostly the same, being different only in the request/response paradigm of HTTP to the more interactive GUI-based systems.

My question is this now:
- Should I draw two sequence diagrams for every use case, for each type of client? Are GUI vs JSP clients that different?
- Would it be appropriate to leave out the transfer objects in the sequence diagrams?
- Should I leave out the Home interface of EJBs in the process of creating a bean instance in the sequence diagrams?
What about direct database reads to the Oracle instance in the FFM box? Since we should have the Perl source code of the system (since Perl is an interpreted language), then we know the queries that reads the mileage data. Besides, if a screen scraper is used, the 10 secs response requirement may be hard to meet since the screen scraper has to log in to the system and do stuff.
Hi All..

I wonder how much details are supposed to be in the Part II sequence
diagrams? My unfinished sequence diagram for the "prepare for itinerary" use
case already spans 7x3 A4 pages and is beginning to be hard to navigate in.
I've included most of the significant participants in the diagram, all of
the Transfer Objects, Data Access Objects, EJBs, Bean Delegates, Service
Locators, JSPs and then some. Am I being too detailed in the diagram or are
they supposed to be large?

TIA.