zf sam

Hi, Paul

I wouldn't have though it's a good idea to open and close the file pointer for each method update called (create/update/delete etc.). I can only conclude that if more concurrency is offered, then a file pointer per server thread generated by rmi is required. Anyone implemented this ?

yes, I think it is a heavy operation for OS to open and close one file pointer, it is not a good idea to maintain several file pointer frequently.
Maybe use only one fp and chg its position every client access, right?

regards, sam